American Journal Of Medicine

May 30, 2008

Walking Helps Lower Blood Pressure

Filed under: Uncategorized — Luis @ 5:00 am

May 30, 2008 (Indianapolis) -- If you have high blood pressure or are extremely overweight, walking may hold the key to improved heart health.

That's the message from researchers who spoke here this week at the annual meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).

A Korean study shows that walking just 40 minutes a day lowered blood pressure in people with hypertension. A U.S. study suggested that taking a stroll offers cardiovascular benefits for people who are morbidly obese.

The Korean researchers studied 23 men with prehypertension or hypertension. "Normal" blood pressure is a measurement of less than 120/80. Hypertension is defined as a reading of 140 over 90 or greater. Those with blood pressure readings between normal blood pressure and high blood pressure are considered to have prehypertension.

The researchers measured the men's blood pressure following a 40-minute brisk walking session and four, 10-minute brisk walking bouts. What's brisk? About 3 to 4 miles per hour, says Saejong Park, PhD, of the Korea Institute of Sport Science in Seoul.

Blood pressure dropped by similar amounts after each type of exercise session. The top number in the blood pressure reading dropped about 5 points after the 40-minute walk and 3 points after the four 10-minute walks, Park tells WebMD. The bottom number of the blood pressure reading dropped about 2 points for both walking sessions.

While longer studies are needed, "we think the benefits will be sustained over time if the men keep exercising," Park says.

The bottom line, she tells WebMD, is that you have a choice when it comes to exercise. "Some people like to work out all at once, but others say they can't comply with an exercise program because they have no time. These findings suggest people with time crunches and busy schedules can fit bits of exercise in throughout the day and reap the same health benefits."

The findings are in line with ACSM recommendations, which call for healthy adults to engage in at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity five days a week. The guidelines state that three 10-minute sessions are as effective as one longer session.

Jeffrey A. Ross, DPM, a clinical professor of medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, recommends alternating walking with other activities.

"Instead of walking seven days a week, take a day off and go swimming or biking. That way you'll work out different muscles and reduce your chance of overuse injuries," Ross says.

Walking Helps Morbidly Obese

The U.S. study involved 14 morbidly obese patients who were scheduled to undergo weight loss surgery. Their average body mass index (BMI) was 46; a person with a BMI of 40 or over is considered to be morbidly obese.

Patients were asked to walk 1 mile at as brisk a pace as possible. They were able to stop and take breaks, but most walked the mile in under 30 minutes, says Thomas Spring, MS, a senior exercise physiologist at William Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, Mich.

Results showed that all 14 "got their heart rate up to an adequate level to have benefits in term of cardiovascular health," Spring tells WebMD. "Walking is a great way for the overweight and obese to begin an exercise program, but always check with your doctor before starting any exercise program."

View Article Sources

SOURCES:

55th American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, May 28-31, 2008.

Saejong Park, PhD, Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul.

Thomas Spring, MS, senior exercise physiologist, William Beaumont Hospital. Royal Oak, Mich.

Andrew Scott, MS, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, England.

Jeffrey A. Ross, DPM, clinical professor of medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

© 2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. SHARE What is this? del.icio.usMore...

C. diff Epidemic: What You Must Know

Filed under: Uncategorized — Luis @ 5:00 am

May 30, 2008 -- While bird flu and MRSA have been making headlines, a dangerous strain of C. diff has been making people sick in 38 U.S. states.

C. diff sickens about a half million Americans every year, and every year the epidemic gets about 10% bigger, CDC medical epidemiologist L. Clifford McDonald, MD, tells WebMD.

Bigger -- and more deadly. The death rate is soaring by 35% a year.

From 1999 to 2004, the bug became four times more lethal, with death rates increasing from 5.7 per million Americans to 23.7 per million Americans in 2004. During one hospital outbreak in Quebec, Canada, the one-year death rate hit 17%.

What's going on? WebMD has answers to these important questions:

  • How bad is C. diff?
  • Is C. diff a superbug?
  • Why are C. diff cases rising so rapidly?
  • Can you get C. diff from food?
  • How do you get C. diff?
  • Who is at risk?
  • What are the symptoms?
  • How is C. diff treated?
  • How is C. diff prevented?

How bad is C. diff?

C. diff disease can range from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis. The bug produces toxins that destroy the mucosal lining of the gut.

There are many different C. diff strains circulating in the U.S. But since 2000, one of these strains has gone from a minor player to become the most frequently isolated C. diff strain. The strain has several names. Referring to its genetic fingerprint, the CDC calls it NAP1. In Europe and Canada, it's often called the 027 or BI strain.

The NAP1 strain of C. diff took off shortly after it acquired resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. There's some evidence it may also have acquired some resistance to Flagyl, one of the two antimicrobial agents used to treat it (the other is vancomycin).

Antibiotic resistance isn't the only worrisome thing about NAP1. C. diff normally makes two toxins. The NAP1 strain makes 16 times more toxin A and 23 times more toxin B. And it also makes another toxin, called binary toxin, although it's not yet clear how this toxin affects humans.

To date, the NAP1 strain has been reported in 37 U.S. states and in the District of Columbia.

A recent report shows that adult C. diff hospitalizations doubled between 2000 and 2005 to about 300,000 hospitalizations a year. That's more hospitalizations than are seen with MRSA, which sends about 126,000 Americans to the hospital each year.

The CDC's C. diff expert, L. Clifford McDonald, MD, tells WebMD that if you count pediatric C. diff cases and cases in the community that do not enter the hospital, there are probably half a million U.S. cases of C. diff infection each year.

And yes, it is an epidemic: The infection rate is going up by about 10% a year. But the death rate is going up even faster, says Marya Zilberberg, MD, adjunct professor at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and president of the EviMed Research Group.

"The disease appears to be more likely to be fatal … nearly doubling from a 1.2% to a 2.2% case fatality rate," Zilberberg tells WebMD.

During a hospital outbreak in Canada, the one-year mortality rate for C. diff infection was 17%.

"We're seeing increases both regionally and nationally in death certificates listing C. diff infection," McDonald says. "And hospitals are saying the same thing."

There are actually three ongoing C. diff epidemics. One is in hospitals. Another is in the community. And a third is in livestock.

Is C. diff a superbug?

"Superbug" is not a scientific term. The CDC's McDonald prefers to avoid it. The media originally coined the term to refer to germs that, like Superman, became bulletproof: That is, they became impervious to drugs that kill other germs. Dictionaries reserve the "superbug" designation for germs resistant to drugs that used to kill them.

"Superbug" has also been used to describe germs that, like many superheroes, once were normal but become super strong: That is, they became much more virulent than they used to be.

"I think if I were to use the word "superbug" I might use it to connote a particular strain or strains of a pathogen in which there has been a convergence of increased resistance to antibiotics … and increased virulence," McDonald says.

All C. diff strains are resistant to many of the antibiotics normally used to treat other infections. In fact, that's the problem. C. diff most often strikes people whose intestinal flora have been disrupted by antibiotic treatment. But most C. diff strains remain sensitive to Flagyl and vancomycin, the drugs normally used to treat this infection.

The NAP1 strain of C. diff, however, is even more resistant to fluoroquinolone antibiotics than other C. diff strains. It makes 20 times more toxin than normal strains. And most importantly, there's evidence it causes more severe disease than other strains.

For these reasons, C. diff NAP1 is now being called a superbug, although you won't see the term in scientific reports.

Why are C. diff cases rising so rapidly?

The number of hospital patients with C. diff infection went up and down a bit from 1996 until 2000. But from 2000 to 2001 there was a steep increase -- and that increase continued at least through 2006. Preliminary data suggest the epidemic may have slowed a bit in 2007, but McDonald says it's too soon to say it's leveled off.

What happened in 2000? McDonald says that's when the NAP1 strain -- which has been around for at least 30 years -- developed fluoroquinolone resistance. This resistance, plus what McDonald calls the strain's "hypertoxin production," may explain why this strain has taken off.

Another reason for the epidemic is the rise of community-acquired C. diff infection. C. diff usually is thought of as a hospital infection, and community cases were thought to come from people who got C. diff during a hospital stay but who didn't develop symptoms until they got home.

A 2006 study in Connecticut showed that community-acquired C. diff disease struck seven people out of 100,000. One in four cases did not have the risk factors normally associated with C. diff. Moreover, a third of these cases had no exposure to antimicrobial drugs.

Where is the C. diff coming from? The vast majority of cases come from person-to-person transmission (see below).

Can you get C. diff from food?

There's troubling evidence that at least a few cases come from food. There are two reasons to think this might happen:

  • In 2005, Canadian researchers bought 53 packages of beef and seven packages of veal from five grocery stores in Ontario and in Quebec. One out of five packages carried C. diff. Two-thirds of the C. diff isolates were similar to the NAP1 strain.
  • C. diff isolates from human patients are quite similar to isolates found in pigs and cattle. Some of the pig isolates are almost indistinguishable from human isolates.

The CDC's McDonald says there is "at least the appearance" of "migration" of strains epidemic in food-producing animals to humans. That's because the animal epidemics occurred before the human epidemic.

"We think that direct transmission from animals to humans via the food supply, IF it occurs at all -- no one has proven this -- would account for a very small proportion of overall human C. diff infection," McDonald writes in an email to WebMD.

The CDC, together with academic researchers, is culturing samples of retail meats; results of these studies are expected soon. Eventually the CDC will look at dietary risk factors associated with community-acquired C. diff infection.

Even if you can get C. diff from food, the vast majority of infections come from person-to-person transmission (see below).

How do you get C. diff?

Even many health care professionals wrongly think everyone carries C. diff in their intestines and that the bug only overgrows when antibiotic therapy or illness disrupts the normal gut ecology and gives it room to grow.

That's not the case. Only 5% of the population is "colonized" by C. diff. And because population studies have only looked at one point in time, even most of these people may only be having a temporary infection.

Even so, more than half of Americans show evidence of a previous C. diff infection some time in their lives. This often happens soon after birth. But infants only rarely get C. diff disease. The reason for this isn't clear, but there's evidence from animal models that C. diff toxins have trouble binding to the immature gut.

C. diff bacteria are very sensitive to oxygen. But C. diff spores are another matter. They are nearly indestructible and can survive for months on dry surfaces. The CDC recommends disinfecting surfaces with bleach, because the usual hospital disinfectants don't affect it.

People with C. diff infection have millions of C. diff spores in their feces. These spores carry the infection to others via what experts indelicately call fecal-oral contact. Careful hand washing rinses the spores from contaminated hands, but alcohol gels won't do the trick.

Two things have to happen for you to get C. diff disease:

  • You have to ingest C. diff spores.
  • Something has to disturb the ecological balance of the normal bacteria living in your colon.

Who is at risk?

More than nine out of 10 hospital infections with C. diff occur in people who have received antibiotic treatment.

But community-acquired C. diff does not depend on antibiotics. The CDC's McDonald says there's evidence that 30% to 40% of community-acquired cases are in people not suffering a current or recent medical problem.

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are most strongly linked to C. diff disease. Risk is also higher for patients who receive multiple antibiotics and for patients who receive longer courses of antibiotic treatment.

Other risk factors include:

  • Age over 65
  • Severe illness
  • Nasogastric intubation
  • Anti-ulcer medications. There is conflicting evidence on this.
  • Long hospital stays, particularly in long-term-care facilities

It's not at all clear how long it takes to get C. diff disease after you've ingested the spores. One study that performed a series of cultures in hospital patients showed that patients who had C. diff disease were not infected the week before.

This suggests incubation can occur in less than seven days. But another study found an increased risk of C. diff disease throughout the first four weeks after leaving the hospital.

What are the symptoms of C. diff disease?

Mild C. diff disease starts with mild to moderate diarrhea with no blood in the stool. Sometimes there's cramping in the lower abdomen, too. Other than mild abdominal tenderness, there aren't any other symptoms.

Severe C. diff disease is another matter. It starts with profuse watery diarrhea and abdominal pain. Patients often have fever, nausea, and dehydration. There may be a little blood in the stool, but very bloody stool is rare.

These symptoms usually signal colitis, a serious bowel infection. If the diarrhea stops after severe colitis, it does not necessarily mean you're getting better. It could be a sign of bowl paralysis and a life-threatening condition called toxic megacolon. Most patients with toxic megacolon need surgery -- and 32% to 50% of patients who undergo surgery for C. diff disease die.

Patients with symptoms of C. diff infection should seek immediate medical attention. Mild C. diff disease can progress quickly to severe disease.

Relapse is common after C. diff infection. There's an ongoing debate over whether this is a true relapse or reinfection.

Whatever the cause, 12% to 24% of patients develop a second episode of C. diff disease within two months. Patients who have two or more relapses have a 50% to 65% chance of yet another recurrence.

How is C. diff treated?

Several different stool tests detect C. diff.

Before starting treatment, stopping treatment with whatever antibiotic you've been taking could be enough. Before effective treatments were developed, one study of 20 patients with C. diff colitis eventually recovered after stopping their antibiotic treatment.

However, doctors will almost always treat C. diff infection with antibiotics. Flagyl is the first-line treatment of choice for mild disease, although patients must be followed closely to be sure this treatment works. Vancomycin is an option for treatment for moderate or severe disease.

There is evidence that treatment with probiotics -- good bacteria that repopulate the gut -- makes antibiotic treatment more effective and prevents relapse. Saccharomyces boulardii appears to be particularly effective, although good results have been seen with Lactobacillus species as well.

How is C. diff prevented?

C. diff is a preventable disease. There are two main means of prevention:

  • Wash your hands. Frequent and careful hand washing keeps you from getting C. diff spores on your hands and carrying them to your mouth.
  • Use antibiotics only when absolutely necessary. Most respiratory infections are caused by viruses, so don't demand antibiotics from your doctor every time you get the sniffles or a cough.

 

View Article Sources

SOURCES:

L. Clifford McDonald, MD, chief, prevention and response branch, division of healthcare quality promotion, CDC.

Marya Zilberberg, MD, adjunct professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; president, EviMed Research Group, Goshen, Mass.

Sunenshine, R.H. and McDonald, L.C. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, February 2006; vol 73: pp 187-197.

Zilberberg, M. Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2008; vol 16.

Redelings, M.D. Emerging Infectious Diseases, September 2007; vol 13.

WebMD Medical News: " Gut Bug Gets Deadlier."

WebMD Medical News: " New Threat from Old Bug."

Huebner, E.S. and Surawicz, C.M. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, March 2006; vol 2: pp 203-208.

CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, April 4, 2008, vol 57: pp 340-343.

Rodriguez-Palacios, A. Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2007; vol 13: pp 485-487.

McFarland, L.V. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006; vol 101: pp 812-822.

Elixhauser, A. and Jhung, M. AHRQ Statistical Brief #50, "Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease in U.S. Hospitals, 1993-2005," April 2008.

McDonald, L.C. Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2006; vol 12: pp 409-415.

© 2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. SHARE What is this? del.icio.usMore...

CFC-Containing Inhalers on the Way Out

Filed under: Uncategorized — Luis @ 5:00 am

May 30, 2008 -- The FDA is reminding patients that many albuterol metered-dose inhalers will soon be removed from the U.S. market.

Inhalers containing chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant will become illegal to produce or sell in the U.S. after Dec. 31, 2008. The phaseout is part of a worldwide effort to eliminate CFCs because they deplete the atmosphere's ozone layer.

"No CFC-propelled inhalers will be available for sale after that date," says Deborah Henderson, senior advisor in the FDA's Office of Executive Programs.

At an estimated 52 million prescriptions per year, albuterol inhalers are among the most popular medications in the U.S. The majority of U.S. patients already use newer albuterol inhalers containing hydrofluoroalkane (HFA).

But CFC-containing inhalers still occupy about 35% of the market, says Badrul Chowdhury, MD, PhD, the director of the FDA's Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Products.

Albuterol inhalers are used to treat wheezing, mostly in patients suffering from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including emphysema.

Four HFA-propelled albuterol inhalers are available in the U.S., including Proair HFA Inhalation Aerosol, Proventil HFA Inhalation Aerosol, and Ventolin HFA Inhalation Aerosol. In addition, an HFA-propelled inhaler containing levalbuterol, a medicine similar to albuterol, is sold under the brand-name Xopenex HFA Inhalation Aerosol.

The FDA issued a public health advisory alerting patients that newer HFA-propelled inhalers may feel and taste different from CFC-propelled medications.

HFA-propelled inhalers may also be dispensed in a smaller puff than patients are used to, Henderson says. "But patients should know that doesn't mean they're not working."

HFA-propelled inhalers are also more expensive than older CFC-containing products. While one generic company, Armstrong, still makes millions of CFC-containing inhaler packs each year, there is no generic form of HFA inhalers, Chowdhury says.

Insurance companies and drug companies are offering rebate programs and payment assistance for the more expensive inhalers, the FDA says. Patients can visit several web sites, including www.inhalertransition.org, for more information.

View Article Sources

SOURCES:

FDA Public Health Advisory, May 30, 2008.

Deborah Henderson, senior advisor, Office of Executive Programs, FDA.

Badrul Chowdhury, MD, PhD, director, Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Products, FDA.

© 2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. SHARE What is this? del.icio.usMore...

Cancer Gene Therapy Advance

Filed under: Uncategorized — Luis @ 5:00 am

May 30, 2008 -- Advexin, a genetically engineered virus carrying an anticancer gene, ups survival in late-stage head/neck cancer. It may work in other cancers, too.

Advexin carries the p53 anticancer gene. The p53 gene is the body's natural mechanism for stopping tumor growth. During many kinds of cancer, mutant versions of p53 arise. That throws a monkey wrench into the body's cancer-fighting machinery.

Cancer Videos

Video: Cancer and ExerciseVideo: Making Chemotherapy SaferVideo: Foods After CancerAll Cancer-Related Videos

Cancer News & Support

Get the latest cancer news and treatment options delivered to your inbox.

Related to

lymphoma, leukemia, chemotherapy, radiation, mammogram, PSA test , colonoscopy, herceptin, tamoxifen, breast cancer -- Colposcopy, lung cancer, skin cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer

© 2008 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using a doctored version of a common cold virus, Advexin carries a new p53 gene into tumor cells. It causes these cells to self-destruct -- and also has a bystander effect that reins in neighboring tumor cells. The main drawback, so far, is that Advexin must be injected directly into tumor cells.

That's why John Nemunaitis, MD, medical director of Dallas' Mary Crowley Cancer Center, and colleagues at Introgen Therapeutics Inc. tested the treatment in patients with late-stage head and neck cancer. It's a deadly cancer, but one that's accessible to direct injection.

Their study enrolled 123 patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whose cancers did not respond to first-line treatment. Because such cancers are almost always fatal, patients received either Advexin or chemotherapy with methotrexate.

Nobody was cured of their very late-stage cancer. And only some of the patients treated with Advexin survived longer. This is because only about half of cancer patients have the p53 mutations that Advexin is designed to fix.

Fortunately, there's a test to see which patients are most likely to respond to Advexin. And those that did have these "favorable" mutations survived longer after Advexin treatment:

  • Patients with favorable p53 profiles survived 7.2 months with Advexin treatment.
  • Patients with unfavorable p53 profiles survived 2.7 months with Advexin treatment.
  • Patients with favorable p53 profiles survived 4.3 months with methotrexate treatment.
  • Patients with unfavorable p53 profiles survived 5.9 months with methotrexate treatment.

A few extra months of life may not seem like a lot. But Nemunaitis says that if Advexin can help patients with the most severe form of cancer, it can do a lot more for patients treated at earlier stages of disease.

"As a doctor, I talk with patients and just being able to offer them several months is frustrating," he tells WebMD. "But we have some patients out nine years now as a result of early participation in our trials. I hope that by treating the most appropriate patients, earlier in their disease, we can offer them much better outcomes in the future."

Nemunaitis says it's likely that in the future, Advexin will probably have to be combined with other forms of chemotherapy to maximize its effect.

And since Advexin has far fewer side effects than traditional chemotherapy -- cold-like fever and chills were the main side effects -- combination therapy with the drug may be more tolerable than other combination chemotherapies.

Nemunaitis reported the findings at this week's meeting of the American Society of Gene Therapy in Boston.

View Article Sources

SOURCES:

John Nemunaitis, MD, executive director, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas.

American Society of Gene Therapy annual meeting, Boston, May 28-June 1, 2008.

Gabrilovich, D.I. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, August 2006; vol 6: pp 823-832.

© 2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. SHARE What is this? del.icio.usMore...

Kids Feel the Burn with Virtual Exercise

Filed under: Uncategorized — Luis @ 5:00 am

May 30, 2008 (Indianapolis) -- They're still no substitute for outdoor sports, but active video games like Nintendo Wii can help your kids break a sweat and burn calories.

That's the bottom line of two new studies presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine.

Parenting Videos

Video: What Is a High Fever?Video: Obesity EducationVideo: Kids and Cold MedicinesAll Parenting-Related Videos

Parenting & Children Newsletter

We love your kid. Sign up for WebMD's healthy kids newsletter.

Related to parenting

parenting tips, potty training, baby food, pink eye, chicken pox, asthma, lice, autism, newborns, toddlers, preschoolers, schoolage, teens, tantrums, breastfeeding, ADHD

© 2008 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.

"If your kids are going to play a video game, and you know they will, these physically active games are better for their health than just moving their thumbs with traditional joysticks," says Gregory Brown, PhD, associate professor of exercise science at the University of Nebraska at Kearney.

And because the virtual exercise platforms meet gamers in the comfort of their own homes, they can actually be helpful in encouraging shy children to exercise, he tells WebMD.

Brown notes that the findings come at a time when nearly one in five school-aged children and teens are obese.

"Anything we can do to fight the epidemic helps," he says. Obesity in childhood and adolescence has been linked to obesity and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

Wii Games Burn Calories

Brown and colleagues studied 25 youngsters whose average age was 11. The kids burned two to three times as many calories when playing Wii Boxing and Wii Tennis than when engaging in traditional handheld video games.

Their average heart rate shot up from 80 to 120 beats per minute -- "about what you'd expect when walking or doing a slow dance," Brown says.

Brown thought the kids would burn even more calories when playing Dance Dance Revolution, where participants stand in front of the television and boogie in step to instructions and graphics on the screen. But that didn't prove to be the case; all three games proved equally beneficial.

Video Games Improve Heart Rates

Researcher Viki Penpraze, a PhD candidate and instructor at the University of Glasgow in Scotland, conducted a similar study, comparing two active games to a handheld game and watching a Simpsons DVD. Participants included 13 children, all around the age of 10.

When the children watched a DVD or played the traditional hand-control video game, they didn't burn off any more calories than they would by reading a book, she says.

But it was a different story when they played Dance Mat Mania and Eye Toy Boxing, where players simulate boxers.

Their heart rates jumped from 80 to up to 160 beats per minutes, the equivalent of brisk walking or even jogging. And they burned two to three times as many calories as during the sedentary activities.

Not All Games Equal

A third study from the Netherlands suggests that not all active games are created equal.

The research team studied six gaming systems: Dance Dance Revolution, Wii Tennis, Eye Toy Beach Volleyball, Xerbike, Lasersquash, and Apartgame.

Parenting Videos

Video: What Is a High Fever?Video: Obesity EducationVideo: Kids and Cold MedicinesAll Parenting-Related Videos

Parenting & Children Newsletter

We love your kid. Sign up for WebMD's healthy kids newsletter.

Related to parenting

parenting tips, potty training, baby food, pink eye, chicken pox, asthma, lice, autism, newborns, toddlers, preschoolers, schoolage, teens, tantrums, breastfeeding, ADHD

© 2008 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.

Results showed that kids didn't burn as many calories when playing Wii Tennis and Eye Toy Beach Volleyball as when playing the other games.

Nevertheless, "any active game is going to be better for your child than a handheld one," says researcher Sanne de Vries, MS, of TNO Prevention and Health in Leiden.

Not a Substitute for "Real" Sports

Commenting on the research, Edward J. Mendelsohn, MD, says, "There's no question that these newer, active video games help to burn calories."

Mendelsohn, an attending physiatrist at St. Vincent's Hospital in New York, says that after a few rounds of Wii Boxing with his 7-year-old son, he often breaks into a sweat.

"Nothing replaces being outside and engaging in active sports with your friends," he tells WebMD. "But if it's raining, this is a fun, easy way to incorporate some fitness into your kids' lives."

View Article Sources

SOURCES:

55th American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, May 28-31, 2008.

Gregory Brown, PhD, associate professor of exercise science, University of Nebraska, Kearney.

Viki Penpraze, University of Glasgow, Scotland.

Sanne de Vries, MS, TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, Netherlands.

Edward J. Mendelsohn, MD, attending physiatrist, St. Vincent's Hospital, New York.

© 2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. SHARE What is this? del.icio.usMore...
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress